Anesthesiologie - Urgentiegeneeskunde
  • Home
  • Updates
    • Nieuws
    • Artikel van de week
    • Tip van de week
    • Congres tips & reviews
    • Cursus Tips & Reviews
  • D-examen
  • Online Lectures
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma
    • Airway Management
    • Prehospital Emergency Medicine
    • Crew Resource Management
    • ResusNL
  • Educatie
    • Apps
    • Podcasts
    • Blogs & Sites
    • Boeken
    • Congressen
    • Cursussen
  • Over ons

​Techniques, success, and adverse events of emergency department adult intubations

6/30/2016

 
Foto
​Ann Emerg Med. 2015 Apr;65(4):363-370

STUDY OBJECTIVE: We describe the operators, techniques, success, and adverse event rates of adult emergency department (ED) intubation through multicenter prospective surveillance.

METHODS: Eighteen EDs in the United States, Canada, and Australia recorded intubation data onto a Web-based data collection tool, with a greater than or equal to 90% reporting compliance requirement. We report proportions with binomial 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and regression, with year as the dependent variable, to model change over time.

RESULTS: Of 18 participating centers, 5 were excluded for failing to meet compliance standards. From the remaining 13 centers, we report data on 17,583 emergency intubations of patients aged 15 years or older from 2002 to 2012. Indications were medical in 65% of patients and trauma in 31%. Rapid sequence intubation was the first method attempted in 85% of encounters. Emergency physicians managed 95% of intubations and most (79%) were physician trainees. Direct laryngoscopy was used in 84% of first attempts. Video laryngoscopy use increased from less than 1% in the first 3 years to 27% in the last 3 years (risk difference 27%; 95% CI 25% to 28%; mean odds ratio increase per year [ie, slope] 1.7; 95% CI 1.6 to 1.8). Etomidate was used in 91% and succinylcholine in 75% of rapid sequence intubations. Among rapid sequence intubations, rocuronium use increased from 8.2% in the first 3 years to 42% in the last 3 years (mean odds ratio increase per year 1.3; 95% CI 1.3 to 1.3). The first-attempt intubation success rate was 83% (95% CI 83% to 84%) and was higher in the last 3 years than in the first 3 (86% versus 80%; risk difference 6.2%; 95% CI 4.2% to 7.8%). The airway was successfully secured in 99.4% of encounters (95% CI 99.3% to 99.6%).

CONCLUSION: In the EDs we studied, emergency intubation has a high and increasing success rate. Both drug and device selection evolved significantly during the study period.
Ga naar artikel

Direct Versus Video Laryngoscopy Using the C-MAC for Tracheal Intubation in the Emergency Department, a Randomized Controlled Trial. 

4/11/2016

 
Foto
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Apr;23(4):433-9. 

​BACKGROUND: Direct laryngoscopy (DL) has long been the most common approach for emergency endotracheal intubation, although the use of video laryngoscopy (VL) is becoming more widespread. Current observational data suggest that VL has higher first-pass success, although randomized trials are lacking.

OBJECTIVES: The objective was to compare first-pass success in patients undergoing emergency intubation with DL or VL using a C-MAC device.

METHODS: This was an open-label, prospective, randomized, controlled trial in an academic emergency department of patients undergoing emergency intubation with a plan of DL for the first attempt. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either DL or VL using a C-MAC device for the first intubation attempt. The primary outcome was first-pass success. Secondary outcomes included time to intubation, development of aspiration pneumonia, and hospital length of stay (LOS). The study was registered at Clinicaltrials.gov, number NCT01710891.

​RESULTS:A total of 198 patients were enrolled and intubated with either DL (n = 95) or VL (n = 103). First-attempt success was 86 and 92% for the DL and VL groups, respectively (difference = -5.9%, 95% confidence interval = -14.5% to 2.7%, p = 0.18). Time to intubation, rates of aspiration pneumonia, and hospital LOS were not different between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing emergency intubation in whom DL was planned for the first attempt, we did not detect a difference between VL or DL using the C-MAC device in first-pass success, duration of intubation attempt, aspiration pneumonia, or hospital LOS.

Ga naar artikel

    Categories

    All
    Airway Management
    Analgesia
    Bleeding
    Bloedverlies
    Brandwonden
    Cardiac Arrest
    Checklist
    CICO
    Coagulopathy
    CPR
    Cricothyrodotomy
    CRM
    Disaster Medicine
    Drugs
    ECLS
    ECMO
    ECPR
    Emergency Anesthesia
    Guideline
    Human Factors
    Hypotension
    Intubation
    Ketamine
    Military Trauma
    MTP
    Multidisciplinary
    OHCA
    Outcome
    Pediatric Resuscitation
    PHEM
    POCUS
    Prehospital
    Procedural Sedation
    Propofol
    Rapid Sequence Induction
    RCT
    Resuscitation
    Sedation
    Shock
    TBI
    Therapeutic Hypothermia
    Tranexaminezuur
    Transfusie
    Trauma
    Trauma Anesthesia
    Traumatic Brain Injury
    Trial
    TXA
    Ultrasound
    Video Laryngoscopy

    Archives

    October 2021
    August 2020
    November 2019
    October 2019
    August 2019
    January 2019
    August 2018
    July 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    September 2014
    June 2014

    RSS Feed

Anesthesiologie - Urgentiegeneeskunde
www.urgentiegeneeskunde.com



de gratis online resource over trauma-anesthesie, reanimatie, resuscitatie, airway management, prehospitale zorg en alles wat te maken heeft met de zorg voor de vitaal bedreigde patient.