These guidelines provide a strategy to manage unanticipated difficulty with tracheal intubation. They are founded on published evidence. Where evidence is lacking, they have been directed by feedback from members of the Difficult Airway Society and based on expert opinion. These guidelines have been informed by advances in the understanding of crisis management; they emphasize the recognition and declaration of difficulty during airway management. A simplified, single algorithm now covers unanticipated difficulties in both routine intubation and rapid sequence induction. Planning for failed intubation should form part of the pre-induction briefing, particularly for urgent surgery. Emphasis is placed on assessment, preparation, positioning, preoxygenation, maintenance of oxygenation, and minimizing trauma from airway interventions. It is recommended that the number of airway interventions are limited, and blind techniques using a bougie or through supraglottic airway devices have been superseded by video- or fibre-optically guided intubation. If tracheal intubation fails, supraglottic airway devices are recommended to provide a route for oxygenation while reviewing how to proceed. Second-generation devices have advantages and are recommended. When both tracheal intubation and supraglottic airway device insertion have failed, waking the patient is the default option. If at this stage, face-mask oxygenation is impossible in the presence of muscle relaxation, cricothyroidotomy should follow immediately. Scalpel cricothyroidotomy is recommended as the preferred rescue technique and should be practised by all anaesthetists. The plans outlined are designed to be simple and easy to follow. They should be regularly rehearsed and made familiar to the whole theatre team.
British Journal Anaesthesia. (2015) 115 (6):827-848.
These guidelines provide a strategy to manage unanticipated difficulty with tracheal intubation. They are founded on published evidence. Where evidence is lacking, they have been directed by feedback from members of the Difficult Airway Society and based on expert opinion. These guidelines have been informed by advances in the understanding of crisis management; they emphasize the recognition and declaration of difficulty during airway management. A simplified, single algorithm now covers unanticipated difficulties in both routine intubation and rapid sequence induction. Planning for failed intubation should form part of the pre-induction briefing, particularly for urgent surgery. Emphasis is placed on assessment, preparation, positioning, preoxygenation, maintenance of oxygenation, and minimizing trauma from airway interventions. It is recommended that the number of airway interventions are limited, and blind techniques using a bougie or through supraglottic airway devices have been superseded by video- or fibre-optically guided intubation. If tracheal intubation fails, supraglottic airway devices are recommended to provide a route for oxygenation while reviewing how to proceed. Second-generation devices have advantages and are recommended. When both tracheal intubation and supraglottic airway device insertion have failed, waking the patient is the default option. If at this stage, face-mask oxygenation is impossible in the presence of muscle relaxation, cricothyroidotomy should follow immediately. Scalpel cricothyroidotomy is recommended as the preferred rescue technique and should be practised by all anaesthetists. The plans outlined are designed to be simple and easy to follow. They should be regularly rehearsed and made familiar to the whole theatre team. Anesthesiologists have an opportunity to meet the grow- ing needs of hospitals in providing care to critically ill, injured, or emergency care surgical patients. Acute care anesthesiology would encompass pre-, intra-, and post- operative care of the critically ill surgical patient, expand the scope of anesthesiology, and contribute to improv- ing the safety and quality of patient care. Although no data currently examine the in uence of the acute care anesthesiologist on outcomes in this patient population, it is not unreasonable to believe that a model similar to that for the acute care surgeon would contribute to bet- ter patient care. The most recent data suggest that ACS is a independent predictor of death and major complica- tions when compared with non–acute care surgery cases with a similar case mix.28 Thus, we need to explore the added value of anesthesiologists: Would an acute care anesthesiologist contribute to better patient outcomes? The specialty of anesthesiology should explore the value of the trained acute care anesthesiologist in this model, possibly using data from the AQI NACOR registry. In our opinion, the acute care anesthesiologist model represents an opportunity for further expansion of the role of anes- thesiologists into the “perioperative surgical home care” model of patients hospitalized for nonelective surgical procedures.
|
Categories
All
Archives
October 2021
|